The working
The total above is the sum of these derived forms. Each is a distinct word built on the same three radicals.
| Form | Translit | Count |
|---|---|---|
| ابْتَغَى | ābtaghā | 34 |
| بَغَى | baghā | 25 |
| ابْتِغاء | ābtighā | 14 |
| بَغْي | baghy | 11 |
| يَنۢبَغِي | yanbaghī | 6 |
| باغ | bāgh | 3 |
| بَغِيّ | baghiyy | 2 |
| بِغاء | bighā | 1 |
Where it occurs most
The sūrahs carrying the most occurrences. A root is rarely spread evenly — where it clusters is usually more telling than the total.
First occurrences
The first verses in muṣḥaf order. Follow any of them to see the word in context.
What this number does not mean
A count is a fact about form. It says how often a set of letters occurs — not how important the idea is, not that the total was designed, and not that it lines up with anything outside the text. Frequency is not guidance: the most common root in the Qurʾān need not be the weightiest, and some of the weightiest are rare.
Counts of this kind are often quoted as evidence of a numerical miracle — usually by picking a counting rule that produces the wanted total and not mentioning that another rule produces a different one. We publish the rule precisely so that cannot happen here. If a claimed count disagrees with this page, the useful question is not who is right but which edition, which morphology, and which unit each side used.